User talk:Malayala Sahityam

Malayala Sahityam is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Welcome!

Hello, Malayala Sahityam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Salih (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

You are doing a good work! Solomon7968 18:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Visappu

The article Visappu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection. One ref has a passing mention, the other none at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarpayajnam

The article Sarpayajnam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection. Neither ref mentions the collection

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anargha Nimisham

The article Anargha Nimisham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection. One reference mentions what appears to be the book in passing, the other not at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating the page on Narayan. Thank you. Ashwin147 (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. You have new messages at Touch Of Light's talk page.
Message added 06:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Touch Of Light (Talk / Contributions) 06:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for listing all works by EMS. If any of these articles are available online, please add a reference to them Saral Simon Stalin 08:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes, too.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Varanasi (novel)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Varanasi (novel), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thehindu.com/books/books-reviews/transience-of-human-love/article5740413.ece.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Varanasi (novel)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Varanasi (novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thehindu.com/books/books-reviews/transience-of-human-love/article5740413.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a (c) 13:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anjaan333

Hello I'm letting you know that I've given strict warning to Anjaan333 about whom you reported @ WP:AIV. I think he will be blocked soon. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 12:26, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

na bangaaru talli

thank u for changing the spelling of the film title. However, I was the creator of the article, plz dont spoil the infobox Mathsraja (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it was not a remake, it was dubbed into malayalam. The film is based on real story happened in andhra, the director deliberately made it into telugu. please stop POV pushing. Mathsraja (talk) 18:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

thank u for the info. However, there are some rules and regulations for Directorate of film festivals to send remakes and bilinguals. As per that rule this film was not sent as a bilingual. hope this clarifies. However, I am still working on the source. Mathsraja (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is what I am saying it is a bilingual film like Eega, you cannot call bilinguals as remakes. DFF website indicates na bangarru talli (Telugu) which was sent to the jury source: http://www.dff.nic.in/61st_NFA-_for_FeatureFilms.pdf Mathsraja (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC) This article has to be prepared in the manner of Eega, or kept as seperate, the question of remake do not arise. Mathsraja (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eega was a bilingual simultaneously shot in Tamil as Naani distributed by different people. please go through the article carefully. The film was later dubbed into malayalam and hindi. After 6 months the articles eega and nanee were merged into one. You can check the talk page of article eega.Mathsraja (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tamil version of eega was also screened at chennai international film festival Mathsraja (talk) 19:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected your statement as Ente was simultaneously produced in telugu. I think now the issue is clear.Mathsraja (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking the film na bangaaru talli was not even released in Andhra till date. I dont know what prompted the director rajesh to send the telugu version to DFF Mathsraja (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award for Poetry

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award for Poetry, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://readtiger.com/wkp/en/Kerala_Sahitya_Akademi_Award.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive261#Anjaan333.
Message added 06:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, I've filed a report at ANI about the user Anjaan333, and wanted to invite you to comment if you felt so inclined. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re "purely promotional"

[1] The content consists of the director claiming his film isnt a cliche and calling it both "tasteful" and "high voltage". That would be the textbook example of being "purely promotional" -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

what the director wants to spread about his film is quite irrelevant and generally contrary to our purpose as an encyclopedia. of course he is going to promote it as "unique" and "not merely" - he's got a huge conflict of interest. promotional and self serving quotes from the "inside" make up a huge proportion of celebrity gossip sites, but they are of little value to encyclopedias. we depend upon third party analysis. if we have a third party saying something, we might want to include the insider's perspective, but without someone from the outside making commentary to set a context, the insider's preening about their own work is just fluff. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot see that the whole point of his quote is to set his film as being apart from other films, to grant it a distinction and novelty that is not possessed by other films, i cannot help you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:57, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need Support

Vegacelebs (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Can you support us in updating some corrections in Raai Laxmi wiki page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raai_Laxmi ) we , vega entertainment provides support to major celebrities in South India , Raai Laxmi is our client , pl let us know pl share you contact details you can reach us - chida@vegaentertain.com , +91 87901999996[reply]

Vegacelebs (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Indulekha (film)

Hi, I'm Schwindy. Malayala Sahityam, thanks for creating Indulekha (film)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider adding more info to this to expand the article (summary, box office performance, critical reviews, etc.) Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Schwindy (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

http://www.mathrubhumi.com/movies/malayalam/423355/ "കളക്ഷന്‍ റെക്കോഡില്‍ ചരിത്രം കുറിച്ച് ദൃശ്യം"]. This source didn't says that 20:20 is the second grossing film of all time and also that source is written in Malayalam so it is not a proper source.....

The third sentence in the Mathrubhumi link says that Drishyam has become the highest grossing film in the 85 year history of Malayalam cinema. The following sentence says that Drishyam crossed the record set by Twenty:20. So whatever written in the respective wiki article can be very well seen in the cited source also. And vernacular media are considered equivalent to English media sources in wiki. Also per WP:FILM, vernacular sources are preferable than English language sources in case of foreign films. Hope your queries are answered. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

The box office details that i provided for "vikramadithyan" is from a reliable source. so kindly do not revert the page. Thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malayalam cinenews (talk • contribs) 13:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manya

An editor is continuously trying to remove sourced content from the main article. Manya married Satya Patel on May 31, 2008. Her marriage news and photos all over in the internet. The editor continuously changes her spouse name to Vikas Bajpai without providing sources. Please try to have a look into this.

Jai98 (talk) 11:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram filmography

Hi! I have been working on this article for quite some time. I'm unable to find the name of the characters Vikram played in the Malayalam films Street (film), Mayoora Nritham and Red Indians (film). Being a Malayali, can you help me with it? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 15:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Class of 1984, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ulsaha Committee

Hi, I'm Ironholds. Malayala Sahityam, thanks for creating Ulsaha Committee!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for writing this article! Please do address the tags on it. Let me know if you need any help doing so :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 16:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenuse Mohamed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jenuse Mohamed, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 06:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jenuse Mohamed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. The tag has not been replaced, as the article passes notability; however in the future please do not remove a CSD tag if you are not the creator of the article. Thank you. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 06:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uthara Unnikrishnan

Hello Malayala Sahityam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uthara Unnikrishnan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Karlhard (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaskar the Rascal

IBTimes is a reliable source, but reliability depends on the facts. There is no review of the author there, opinion is entirely based on the three local site reviews. Read it once more and understand. You can be a fan but don't consider wikipedia for promotion. VagaboundWind (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Uthara Unnikrishnan

On 23 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uthara Unnikrishnan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 10-year-old Uthara Unnikrishnan is the youngest-ever recipient of the Indian National Film Award for Best Female Playback Singer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uthara Unnikrishnan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lailaa O Lailaa

From the source of IBTimes, their verdict was based on 3 reviews & 2 of them are unprofessional sites onlookersmedia and lensmen.com. So it cannot be used as an overall verdict of the film as "below average". Even the heading of the article is "'Lailaa O Lailaa' Movie Review Round-Up: Critics Rate Mohanlal–Amala Paul Starrer as "Average" It questions articles credibility. And IBTimes is not a review aggregator. "The sources must be based on facts". And i had added another source click here from IBTimes itself saying "the film has opened to average reviews". it's contradicting. And more over an additional source, which is much important for Wikipedia. VagaboundWind (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Harith

Thanks for the notification at User talk:Harithvh#Recent page moves and extermely sorry for overriding the policies, which was never my indention, which is rather to keep the right information on the specified pages.
If the books that are subjects of the respective articles (Goat Days, Kesavan's Lamentations and God's Mischief) are more known with their English titles, than their original titles, then the keeping English titles shall be fine (eg:The Three Musketeers), however the case of these titles are not similar I suppose, and statement like God's Mischief (original title: Daivathinte Vikrithikal) is a 1989 Malayalam novel written by M. Mukundan, is grossly misleading as the translation was reportedly released in 2013 as per the article and this amounts to scripting error, that implies God's Mischief is a 1989 Malayalam novel. Please start the discussion about the same so that you and those who involved in the contents of the respective articles can reach a consensus regarding the same, referring to multiple sources both online and offline, I'll better step back for now as there are other major contributors to the articles.

Kindly keep the right information on the respective pages.

Apart from the above, let me use this opportunity to bring into your notice about the translations of Indulekha (novel) on the respective page. As per your edit on 05:05, 29 May 2014, The novel has been translated into many languages. Kindly do the quantification of the many and clarification of languages, both are tagged as per the requirements as on 16 February 2015‎, your edit is only about English translations. Information given might be in accordance with the cited article from the Mathrubhumi Illustrated Weekily, but its better to rewrite with additional references or as a quotation (please use the quote parameter in the citation template, while doing so) by the respective authors, if you are not sure about the details.
Happy Editing
(harith (talk) 04:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC))[reply]

We are writing an encyclopedia not a breathless celebrity gossip column

If you want to source objective box office numbers, fine. But just because there is a "source" doesn't mean that we include it. We dont include meaningless drivel such as "flop" or "hit" or "super duper colossal mega wonder hit!!!!11!!!1!". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: It is not right to say that Wikipedia does not use what you call "meaningless drivel such as flop". There is even an article titled List of box office bombs. I will try to reword what I had written and attribute it to the source which reported that. Let the readers decide whether to buy it or not. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have consensus to add it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mundur Krishnankutty

added a link pointing to Mundur

Priya A. S.

added a link pointing to Maharajas College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Malayalam literary awards page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited V. M. Devadas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vadakkancheri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sufi Paranja Katha (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sufi Paranja Katha (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.in.com/tv/movies/surya-tv-136/sufi-paranja-katha-42542.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Valliettan page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sufi Paranja Katha (film)

The content clearly hasn't been there since March 2010 because the page was only created in August 2015 and hadn't existed before. Did you copy the text from another article? If so you need to follow the procedure in WP:CWW and attribute it to the source article in your edit summary. (Otherwise using that text is actually a copyright violation unless you added it yourself.) Hut 8.5 06:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hut 8.5: Thanks for the information. I didn't know that copying within wikipedia requires proper attribution. The parent article was created in 2010 and the plot summary was added by User:Sreejithk2000. I will now attribute the content to the original author in the edit summary. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 06:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, thanks. (You don't necessarily have to do it in the edit where you attribute the content, you can just make any old edit to the page and include something like that in the edit summary.) Hut 8.5 17:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

padmarajan films link to youtube

why to deny access the padmarajan movies in youtube?--Dvellakat (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dvellakat: The director of the film is immaterial here. Per Wikipedia guideline (see WP:ELNO and WP:VIDEOLINK), you cannot link to any copyright violation, such as a film or music video. Sorry for not notifying you the proper reason for the revert. - Malayala Sahityam (talk) 13:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Malayala Sahityam: sorry for the act if it is copyright violation. but i was in an idea that you tube is not violating copyright. and so it is safe to publish. then Malayalam Wikipedia also linking many from you tube videos Dvellakat (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dvellakat: Many YouTube videos are illegally uploaded and are copyright violation. We normally include video links only if the film is in public domain. I am not sure about Malayalam Wikipedia entries but if such links are used, then they should definitely be removed. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arundhati Roy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In November 2011, she was awarded the [[Norman Mailer Prize]] for Distinguished Writing.<ref>[http://hamishhamilton.co.uk/news/from-norman-mailer-to-arundhati-roy "From Norman Mailer to
roy "From Norman Mailer to Arundhati Roy". [[Hamish Hamilton]]. Retrieved December 13, 2015).</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Vallathol Narayana Menon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vallathol Narayana Menon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chokher Bali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (K. M. George) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating K. M. George, Malayala Sahityam!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Note that per MOS:DAB, entries should have only a single link per line.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jenuse Mohamed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenuse Mohamed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenuse Mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Let There Be Sunshine 16:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Awards

A tag has been placed on 2017 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

moved page due to wrong year. unable to create proper page now.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jojo@nthony (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhakar Mangalodayam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sudhakar Mangalodayam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 12:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sudhakar Mangalodayam concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sudhakar Mangalodayam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sudhakar Mangalodayam

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sudhakar Mangalodayam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

M. T. Vasudevan Nair

I've seen you're continuously making the change to MT's date of birth. Please check the talk page before making such solo decisions. --Joseph 💬 12:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

You're leaving messages for people and reverting edits while logged out. Although editing while logged out is not against the rules, it is disruptive to edit while logged out to avoid scrutiny. This is especially important when you're editing articles both logged-out and with your account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for U. A. Khader

On 13 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article U. A. Khader, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sugathakumari

On 27 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sugathakumari, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 10:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indulekha (1967 film)

The article Indulekha (1967 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indulekha (1967 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indulekha (1967 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indulekha (1967 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indulekha novel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indulekha novel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Government Engineering College, Thrissur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for making Wikipedia more useful Padavalam🌂 ► 15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cynic (film critic) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cynic (film critic), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of T. M. P. Nedungadi

The article T. M. P. Nedungadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T. M. P. Nedungadi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, T. M. P. Nedungadi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pramod Raman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pramod Raman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pramod Raman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iamfarzan (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cynic (film critic)

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cynic (film critic), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:T. M. P. Nedungadi

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T. M. P. Nedungadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Malayala Sahityam. Thank you for your work on Oduvil Kunhikrishna Menon. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C. S. Gopala Panicker

The article C. S. Gopala Panicker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per my research this is not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011 moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Have Become the Tide

Hello, Malayala Sahityam, I have restored the category you have twice removed because it is supported by the content and reference in the article, and because categories help readers find relevant content. We can continue to discuss this on the article talk page, or find another dispute resolution option. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for your patience with my misunderstanding and your kind explanations. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O. V. Vijayan Literary Award

Hi friend, The literary award in the name of O. V. Vijayan that Mathews and V. M. Devadas received recently is different from the award mentioned in the article by name, O. V. Vijayan Literary Award. The one in the article is given by Naveena Samskaarika Kala Kendram, Hyderabad (https://www.dcbooks.com/o-v-vijayan-literary-award-for-karunakaran.html) while the award which was announced recently is sponsored by O. V. Vijayan Smaraka Samithi in Tasrak, in Palakkad, Kerala. As such, I have reverted your good faith edit on the award page.--jojo@nthony (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tachs. Sorry, I did not bother to read the entire article before putting that up in Wikipedia. Thank you for your revert and for notifying it here. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it was just an oversight. Happy editing! jojo@nthony (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I wanted to appreciate you for giving your time and effort to write history and literature related articles. You are a a great contributor to this encyclopedia! Thilsebatti (talk) 05:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fellows of the Kerala Sangeetha Nataka Akademi

A tag has been placed on Category:Fellows of the Kerala Sangeetha Nataka Akademi indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help to better Iratta

I have seen your edits for Christy. if you could provide Reception info and other such details in clarity. They page can be put for review. As this page has been previously deleted. Aadirulez8 (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am actually on a short wiki break but will try to improve the article if time permits.Malayala Sahityam (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Vellapokkathil is a very good page. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thayat Sankaran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thayat Sankaran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After adding additional citations to meet our notability guidelines I moved it back to mainspace. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working on the article and moving it back to mainspace. I was planning to work on it in the coming days but was just demotivated as I always feel when articles get draftified in the first place. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both of us are from Kerala so we know Thayat Sankaran is notable. But this kind of problem can happen anytime. Do you know any websites like internet archive from where we could collect information from old Malayalam newspapers? This could be really helpful. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think there are any. However, Internet Archive does have some old magazines like Malayalanadu, Kalakaumudi, and Malayalam Vaarika archived. Although these collections are not complete, they still have a good number of issues available. Also, the Indian Express Madras edition is available on Google Newspapers and has a good coverage of Kerala topics. You may already be aware of this, but otherwise, it is a very useful resource. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Tusk001 (talk) 13:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author not found in the list

Hi. I created Ambadi Ikkavamma by translating from the Malayalam wikipedia. As per ml wiki and a source from Mathrubhumi, she is the winner of 1978 Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award. But I was not able to find her name on the list of any of the 12 categories. Any idea what went wrong? Thilsebatti (talk) 06:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Thilsebatti. Apologies for the delayed response. I have checked the official website for the award recipients across all the categories for 1978 and other years and I could not find her name listed. Additionally, I also checked the recipients of the endowment awards (some of which were active in 1978), but her name did not appear there either. It seems that the Mathrubhumi source is incorrect. IMO, it would be advisable to remove the claim of her receiving the award. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me correct it. Thilsebatti (talk) 01:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011 has been accepted

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards 2011, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year

Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy

Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles

Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge

Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors

News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified

In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled

Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune

Humour: Letters from the editors

Comix: Layout issue

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV

News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law

WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap

WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)

Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users

Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't force Wikipedia to support its own preferences

Don't force Wikipedia to support its own preferences, don't remove Controversy sections from the E. P. Jayarajan when there is clear WP:RELIABLE, poor quality of writing can be re-edited, don't change sections of Controversy, this is a current event on this page of E. P. Jayarajan. There also Arya Rajendran ~ Spworld2 talk 12:36, 01 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy sections E. P. Jayarajan and Arya Rajendran

Your continued removal of the Controversy section looks like something for WP:CONFLICT, and I hope you know that Wikipedia is not a WP:NOTPROMO. There is a clear WP:REF to the Controversy section on Jayarajan's page To maintain the section. Even the Chief Minister of the state has referred to this in a press conference and said there is evidence for it

Similarly, this Arya Rajendran also comes in the same case as the above. The mayor used his own car to block public transport and there was a verbal dispute, and there are many evidences of this including CCTV footage.

Continuing to remove this conversancy makes your Wikipedia editing experience appear as if your politics (WP:CONFLICT) are exposed. ~ Spworld2 talk 4:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)